*Independent Fundamental Baptist
  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

About DaveW

Profile Information

  • Gender Male
  • Location: I'm a West Aussie
  • Are you IFB? Yes

Recent Profile Visitors

9,162 profile views
  1. Praise the Lord!

    I take no tablets or medicines if I can get away with it - I just don't like to. Not even paracetamol for a headache unless I am absolutely out with it - which is rare. I am not opposed absolutely, and we do have various medicines in the house, I just personally don't like to take anything. Even with my back - which is incredibly painful when it really goes wrong - I won't take anti-inflammatories unless there is no improvement after three or four days. I can't even really tell you why, but I just do not like filling myself up with artificial stuff. My wife has to take a couple of medicines, and the kids will take paracetamol for headaches, but not me......... Maybe I am really just a bit dumb?
  2. Praise the Lord!

    I used to be quite fit - I used to ride 400km per week to work and back, but then I injured myself and was not able to ride for some time. When I started up again I had another health problem which stopped me from getting back into it. But about two weeks ago I determined to start doing something about my general health - I will not be riding like that for some time, but shorter rides should be do-able. I have started some diet changes - although my diet in general is not bad - it is the exercise that is the problem. Last time I started to exercise I re-injured my back, so I will be taking it easy at first, but I know I have to do something. My blood pressure has never been a problem, until the last few years it is on the high side - not medication high (Which I would probably not take anyway), but "better keep an eye on that" high. But I don't want it to become a problem.
  3. Praise the Lord!

    I gave blood the other day, and my BP was 143/96. I am also making some changes, but the BP is an extra incentive. Oh year - I meant to say "well done"! (I liked the OP but then forgot the congrats! )
  4. What is a "Landmark" Baptist church

    I have no idea about that link or whoever you are talking about. I asked a simple question with no implied pointof view. The passage I referenced speaks of the bride and also speaks of "they which are called to the marriage supper of the Lamb". It indicates that there is a bride and also another group, those called to the marriage. My question (with no implied point of view on my part) is: who are these two separate groups, the bride, and those called to the marriage?
  5. What is a "Landmark" Baptist church

    Did you bother to read the question, or even the verse? Why don't you go ahead and do that, then reply.
  6. What is a "Landmark" Baptist church

    Serious question: Who are "they which are called" if all true believers make up the bride? Rev 19:9 And he saith unto me, Write, Blessed are they which are called unto the marriage supper of the Lamb. And he saith unto me, These are the true sayings of God. The bride is spoken of separately in the previous verses. I think we can safely assume that the unrighteous will not be invited, so who are these "guests"?
  7. People don't get taller due to longer lifespan. Reptiles continue to grow throughout their lifespan, but people do not. Most mammals reach a mature size and stop growing at that point. IF people were taller pre-flood, it would be due to environmental factors such as better nutrition, not long ages.
  8. The 7th Shemita is here

    I simply understand when someone is promoting Calvinism.
  9. The 7th Shemita is here

    Oh ok - Calvinism then. Thanks for making that plain for us all. Just had to quote it before you change it.
  10. What is a "Landmark" Baptist church

    Landmark Baptists are quite hard to nail down as each one is a little bit different to the next one. Outsiders will generally consider them to be "baptist bride" as outlined above, but then as 360watt explains that is not quite universal - and in fact you will rarely hear any Landmarker use that term about themselves. However, I know some guys over here that would deny the "landmark name" but are always talking about the bride in ways similar to that. I have been told also that Landmarkers tend towards Calvinism, but these same guys I spoke of last line are anything but Calvinists - vehemently opposed - probably even moreso than myself. As to 360's point on local church only - this is not an attribute of landmarkers alone. Most Independent Baptists I personally know are solid local church people. The name comes from "Holding to the landmarks of the Faith", and some of them tend to be almost militant in their separation from anything less than themselves. I have met some to whom I would ascribe a certain pride in their belief that they hold a better position than lesser Christians, but this is a minority, and they are not the sole holders of that either. The point really is that you have to check out what they believe on a case by case basis, because there are some reasonable folk among their number, and some absolute nutters, and that in itself makes it hard to define exactly what landmarks each church holds to. Other things I can't remember right now.........
  11. The 7th Shemita is here

    I don't know if this is clumsy wording, but the Gospel is for the benefit of unbelievers. It seems that at points in this quote you are expanding your scope beyond prophecy. If that is the case then you are outright wrong. But again, God on occasion told unbelievers of future events - a couple of kings for instance were told of their own future, and they clearly did not believe in the One True God when the prophecy was given to them.
  12. Peter knew Jesus would not return in his lifetime

    I heard a preacher mention that, when Peter was arrested by Herod in Acts 12, he wasn't worried about being killed as John had been. In his preaching (it was a side point, not the thrust of the message) he said Peter probably asked for a mirror and when he saw his hair wasn't grey and his legs still strong he knew he had a few years yet. I had never thought about it until then, but whatever Peter preached, he knew he had enough years to grow old to keep preaching and serving the Lord.
  13. The 7th Shemita is here

    And you need to read the rest of the passage. That's the rest of the passage........
  14. The 7th Shemita is here

    You are so desperate to prove Eric wrong that you are clutching at straws. 1. It is not stated but it is a reasonable assumption given the context. 2. 1 Corinthians 3 1 And I, brethren, could not speak unto you as unto spiritual, but as unto carnal, even as unto babes in Christ. 2 I have fed you with milk, and not with meat: for hitherto ye were not able to bear it, neither yet now are ye able. 3 For ye are yet carnal: for whereasthere is among you envying, and strife, and divisions, are ye not carnal, and walk as men? 4 For while one saith, I am of Paul; and another, I am of Apollos; are ye not carnal? 5 Who then is Paul, and who isApollos, but ministers by whom ye believed, even as the Lord gave to every man? 6 I have planted, Apollos watered; but God gave the increase. 7 So then neither is he that planteth any thing, neither he that watereth; but God that giveth the increase. 8 Now he that planteth and he that watereth are one: and every man shall receive his own reward according to his own labour. 9 For we are labourers together with God: ye are God's husbandry, ye areGod's building. 10 According to the grace of God which is given unto me, as a wise masterbuilder, I have laid the foundation, and another buildeth thereon. But let every man take heed how he buildeth thereupon. 11 For other foundation can no man lay than that is laid, which is Jesus Christ. 12 Now if any man build upon this foundation gold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, stubble; 13 Every man's work shall be made manifest: for the day shall declare it, because it shall be revealed by fire; and the fire shall try every man's work of what sort it is. 14 If any man's work abide which he hath built thereupon, he shall receive a reward. 15 If any man's work shall be burned, he shall suffer loss: but he himself shall be saved; yet so as by fire. Considering vs 14 says "if any man's work abide WHICH HE HATH BUILT THEREUPON....." I can see why people would think it is talking about the works that a man builds upon the foundation. Paul is teaching that a saved man's works in this life will be judged, but not for his salvation. That is contextually correct, and you are twisting Scripture. On these two references Eric is far closer than you are.........
  15. The 7th Shemita is here

    The denial was not that hard was it? But the doublespeak explanation is confusing.......... As for Eric's "teaching" here - Eric "interprets", but doesn't present doctrine very often. Personally, I think he often overstates his interpretations and applications, and I have told him so before. But he doesn't teach false doctrines like some here do, and he doesn't try to overthrow the faith of some, as some here do.