No, I'm one of those people who don't have time (nor typing ability) to type out every thing in detail (I type using the Biblical system - "Seek and ye shall find"). You're already moving (think broad road, etc) and when you turn to Christ - THAT is still movement.
We were alienated from God Eph 2:12; Eph 2:5 , enemies of God Jas 4:4, not following God Rom 3:11; , we turn to Him Act_20:21 --- that's an about face. You were trying to read something into what I said that wasn't there.
If you will READ my comment then you will realize that it was not for the references concerning Mohammedism but due to language -- NOT insulting language, but vulgar language. It wouldn't matter if it had been a post about a literal 7 day creation, if it had contained the aforementioned word - the result would be the same. Normally inappropriate language gets 1 warning point, however you have been previously warned about such and managed to garner 4 -- congratulations.
There is a word in there that the world invented to "tone down" and "civilize" an existing term already considered offensive (I was around - and lost - long before the new euphemism was coined). No, I'll not highlight, underline nor rewrite it. I'm also leaving the responses but deleting the OP.
Incidentally, you're doing a good job of wearing out your welcome.
I just found it amusing since a bobwhite is a quail, but I don't put it past someone to name their child that -- my grandmother was Pearl Nichols (think nickles)and then after marriage was Pearl White. I knew a Dora Bell (doorbell?), Rusty Hammer and several others.
Old-Pilgrim: I sure haven't had the time to wade through all of your threads and posts, and probably won't have time for 6 more weeks minimum -- by that time I'll probably have difficulty getting all of them together because I foresee it numbering in the hundreds. You started this one with a quoted article from a Sovereign Grace seminar, haven't (as far as I've seen) disagreed with nor refuted it's content and yet say you are not Calvinistic. Is this rhetorical shuffle footing? Is there a legitimate definable, distinction? Is this similar to what some of the inmates I deal with do? Haven't had the time to try and find out.
Knowing you may not consider a female mod to have any weight and may consider her to out of line (or out of place), let me interject as a male who may very well be old enough to be your daddy (or at least older brother or uncle). You are in someone else's house (Bro. Matt's). If you don't like his house rules or the staff he has chosen -- get over it with your mouth shut or go somewhere else to pout. Don't bother trying to compare your treatment with what you perceive as being another's treatment here -- you may be right, you may be wrong but that doesn't change the fact that you've been warned at least twice.
I hope I haven't been too vague since I may not have time for clarification. Sometimes I'm shown as online and yet not even be home.
I stated: If you intend ....... followed by If you intend ........ not an automatic assumption that it is your intent.
Also, it was far outside of your general response pattern to just repeat the same question repeatedly which is why I asked if there was some outside problem or not (which you indicated there was). The caps and exclamation marks was a matter of incredulation, not volume. That's the problem with written exchange vs vocal, no inflection and no facial or body language.
Stop, back up, re-read. He said Dennis gave the same answer that he (John81) would be re-typing to save you the trouble of referencing back and reading. He told you the same each time you repeated yourself -- if he didn't respond that would be one thing, but he did. If you want to respond based off of what Dennis said just as though it represents John's mindset -- go for it, John says that it does. If you just want to act like the bratty kid who pesters his mama in order to get what he wants --------- KNOCK IT OFF!