Pastor Scott Markle

*Independent Fundamental Baptist
  • Content count

    967
  • Joined

  • Last visited


About Pastor Scott Markle

  • Rank
    Abiding in Christ
  • Birthday 08/13/1971
  • Bio My name is Scott Markle, and I have served the Lord my God and Savior in pastoral ministry since 1992. I have served as the pastor of Melvin Baptist Church, a small country church in the Thumb area of Michigan, since 1998. I have been joyfully married to my beloved wife Kerry since 1993; and we have been blessed of the Lord with two sons, Padraic and Westley.

    My life-verses are Philippians 3:8 and John 15:4-5. "Yea, doubtless, and I count all things but loss for the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord: for whom I have suffered the loss of all things, and do count them but dung, that I may win Christ." "Abide in me, and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit of itself, except it abide in the vine: no more can ye except ye abide in me. I am the vine, ye are the branches. He that abideth in, and I in him, the same bringeth much fruit: for without me ye can do nothing." The burden of my life is to pursue "the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord" and to walk daily abiding in Christ, and Christ in me.

    Concerning all my ministry, it is the burden of my heart to exalt, not myself, but the name of Jesus Christ and the truth of God's Word. It is my burden that Christ must increase, while I must decrease. Therefore, I maintain the policy that my name, as the author of a book, must remain smaller, while the phrase, "For the Glory of the Lord," must stand larger above it. Thus far the Lord our God has graciously allowed me to self-publish two books which can be purchased at my website: "God's Wisdom for Marriage & The Home" and "The Spirit of Revival: A Contrite and Humble Spirit." In addition, I maintain a daily (Monday-Friday) Bible study blog at that website.

Contact Methods

  • Website URL http://www.shepherdingtheflock.com

Profile Information

  • Gender Male
  • Location: Melvin, MI
  • Are you IFB? Yes

Recent Profile Visitors


3,921 profile views

Pastor Scott Markle's Activity

  1. Pastor Scott Markle added a post in a topic: Understanding Revelation   

    In the opening post, Brother "Covenanter" made the above quote.  By the context of his entire posting and by the context of his belief system, I understand that he was intending to communicate that the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD by the Roman armies is presented and prophesied within Revelation 11.  I am presenting this posting in order to express my contention against that particular assertion.
    Certainly, I would agree that our Lord's declaration in Luke 19:42-44 is a prophetic utterance concerning the destruction of Jerusalem which was historically fulfilled in 70 AD. Therein our Lord proclaimed, " Saying, If thou hadst known, even thou, at least in this thy day, the things which belong unto thy peace!  But now they are hid from thine eyes.  For the days shall come upon thee, that thine enemies shall cast a trench about thee, and compass thee round, and keep thee in on every side, and shall lay thee even with the ground, and thy children within thee; and they shall not leave in thee one stone upon another; because thou knewest not the time of thy visitation . "
    In this declaration, our Lord Jesus Christ revealed at least three truths concerning this destruction of Jerusalem, as follows:
    1.  That the enemies of the Israelites would besiege the city of Jerusalem, casting "a trench" around it and surrounding it "on every side."
    2.  That the enemies of the Israelites would tear down the city of Jerusalem, laying it "even to the ground," along with its Israelite inhabitants.
    3.  That the enemies of the Israelites, in tearing down the city of Jerusalem, would not leave in it even "one stone upon another."
    Again, I would certainly acknowledge and agree that this prophetic utterance concerning the destruction of Jerusalem was indeed fulfilled in 70 AD by the armies of Rome.
    On the other hand, the assertion has been made that within Revelation 11 is another prophetic utterance concerning this particular destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD.  With this assertion I must strongly disagree.  Revelation 11:1 begins the chapter with a reference to the temple in Jerusalem.  Verse 2 indicates that "the court which is without the temple" shall be "given unto the Gentiles."  Furthermore, this verse indicates that the Gentiles shall tread under their feet "the holy city," Jerusalem, for 42 months (that is -- 3.5 years).  However, this reference cannot mean that the Gentiles utterly destroy the city of Jerusalem so that they do not leaven even "one stone upon another," since the Lord's two witnesses (about which verses 3-12 speak) preach in the city for 1260 days (that is also -- 3.5 years), and then are killed in the city so that their dead bodies lie "in the street of the great city, . . . where also our Lord was crucified" (certainly, Jerusalem) for 3.5 days. (See verse 7-8)  Yet from verses 11-12 we learn that these two witnesses will be resurrected from the dead after the 3.5 days, and shall be called up to heaven so that they "ascend up to heaven in a cloud."  
    Then Revelation 11:13 states, " And the same hour was there a great earthquake, and the tenth part of the city fell, and in the earthquake were slain of men seven thousand: and the remnant were affrighted, and gave glory to the God of heaven . "  Actually, this is only verse Revelation 11 that speaks concerning the destruction of Jerusalem.  Now, from this verse we are brought to understand that the city of Jerusalem had to be standing in order for a tenth of it to fall in destruction.  Such would indicate that treading under foot by the Gentiles in verse 2 was not a reference to destruction, such that they did not leave even "one stone upon another."  If not two stones were standing upon another, then it would not be possible for a tenth of the city to fall.
    Yet Revelation 11:13 does indeed prophecy concerning a destructive event that will occur upon the city of Jerusalem.  Yea, it also reveals at least four truths concerning this destructive event upon Jerusalem, as follows:
    1.  This destructive event will occur in the same hour that the Lord's two witnesses ascend alive into heaven.
    2.  This destructive event will occur through the force of an earthquake, not through the force of human armies.
    3.  This destructive event will cause only one tenth of the city to fall, not the entire city such that not two stones are left upon another.
    4.  This destructive event will leave alive a remnant of the inhabitants of the city (probably Israelites), who will be moved to fear and to give "glory to the God of heaven."
    To me it would appear fairly reasonable to conclude that since the two prophetic utterances concerning the destruction of Jerusalem are not at all parallel in their information (save that they will occur to the same city), then they must not be referring to the same destructive event.
    Now, allow me to present a point of basic logic.  As I have indicated above, I do acknowledge that our Lord's prophetic utterance of Luke 19:42-44 was fulfilled with the complete destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD by the armies of Rome.  Yet if that city should ever be built again after that event, then it would be possible for that city to be destroyed yet again in another destructive event.  As such, unless there is some prophetic utterance of God's Holy Word which indicates that the city of Jerusalem would never be built again, basic logic would allow that not every prophetic utterance in the New Testament concerning the destruction of Jerusalem must automatically be applied to the event of 70 AD.
    (A final note:  If indeed the prophetic utterance of Revelation 11 is not referring to the destruction of 70 AD, wherein the entire city and the entire temple were destroyed, but to some destructive event upon the city after the city has experienced a rebuild, then we must also conclude that there will be a rebuilding of the temple within the city as per Revelation 11:1.)
     
    For the Excellency of the Knowledge of Christ Jesus our Lord,
    Abiding in Christ, and Christ in us,
    Pastor Scott Markle
     
  2. Pastor Scott Markle added a post in a topic: Some "Formatting & Use" Questions   

    Thank you, Brother Jim, for your help and for the information.
  3. Pastor Scott Markle added a post in a topic: Some "Formatting & Use" Questions   

    To whomever may be able to provide answers, I have a few "formatting & use" questions --
    1.  In the past setup of Online Baptist, we could create an automatic "ending element" (I am not sure of the technical term) for all of our postings.  Mine used to read as follows:
    For the Excellency of the Knowledge of Christ Jesus our Lord,
    Abiding in Christ, and Christ in us,
    Pastor Scott Markle
    www.shepherdingtheflock.com
    Does this new setup for Online Baptist still have such a formatting element?  If it does, I cannot find it; therefore, could someone direct me to it?
    2. I notice that the present formatting for Online Baptist causes a double space at the end of every "paragraph."  I like this feature for regular paragraph writing.  However, it is not so preferred for something like a complementary closing, where each line of the closing should be together without spacing.  Is there a way to turn off the "double space at the end of a paragraph" feature for certain sections of a posting (or even for an entire posting)?
    3.  In the past set up of Online Baptist, when I entered a thread I would be taken automatically to the first posting of that thread since my last visit.  However, now I am taken to the very first posting of the thread every time.  As a thread becomes much longer, this occurrence becomes more "annoying."  Is there some formatting method that I have missed, that would allow me to go automatically to the first posting of a thread since may last visit, as in the past?  If there is, could someone reveal it to me?
    Thank you, whomever, for whatever help you may be able to provide in these matters.
    Pastor Scott Markle
  4. Pastor Scott Markle added a post in a topic: Understanding Revelation   

    To all the Brethren who may be interested,
    Although I do not have the time this very morning (I am hoping to have the time later this afternoon), I do intend to make some comments concerning the reference above about the destruction of Jerusalem in Revelation 11.  Specifically, I intend to demonstrate that the record of Revelation 11 concerning Jerusalem was NOT that which occurred in 70 AD, when the Roman armies destroyed the city.
    Now, I have been moved to engage in this matter (at least somewhat) by a private message request from Brother Alan concerning his Revelation 19-22 study-thread.  Yesterday I read through the entirety of that thread, and this morning I read the newest postings therein.  With that in mind, I then entered this new thread and have been moved to engage with it at least (at this point) concerning the Revelation 11 reference.
    (Side note:  I am also considering starting a new thread entitled -- "There IS a coming millennium."  However, I must pray over this consideration, whether this is the Lord's direction, and not just my own purpose, and whether I will have the appropriate amount of time to invest therein.)
    For the Excellency of the Knowledge of Christ Jesus our Lord,
    Abiding in Christ, and Christ in us,
    Pastor Scott Markle
  5. Pastor Scott Markle added a post in a topic: Shepherding the Flock - Audio Sermon - Why We Need to Be in God's Word Daily (P2)   

    Please share this post with others: [...]
    View the full article
  6. Pastor Scott Markle added a post in a topic: Shepherding the Flock - Audio Sermon - Why We Need to Be in God's Word Daily (P1)   

    Please share this post with others: [...]
    [url={url}]View the full article[/url]
  7. Pastor Scott Markle added a post in a topic: Prophecy Debate?   

    ​Amen, and AMEN! 
    Members of the audience graciously remaining out of the debate until its conclusion (however that is determined) is also very important to me.  This is not because I am not interested in the thoughts and comments of others, but because too many contributors tends to "explode" the thread, and then I am unable to "keep up" with the discussion.  On the other hand, if members of the audience wish to start a side discussion thread, I will seek as much as I am able to follow that discussion.  This is not a promise that I will be able to "keep up" with engaging in that side discussion, but I will endeavor to "keep up" with reading the comments and contributions of others.  In addition, if members of the audience desired to "private message" some comment to me, whether positive or negative, I would be willing to receive them and to consider them also.
  8. Pastor Scott Markle added a post in a topic: Prophecy Debate?   

    I agree to the following:
    1. No accusations of heresy.  However, expressions of disagreement are expected, since we are engaging in debate-discussion.
    2. No major quotes from the internet (since I have no intention of quoting from the internet whatsoever at all).
    3. An agreed, specific topic.  I simply suggest that we return to our discussion on Daniel 9, since we already began this discussion-debate.  I further suggest that such discussion begin with a quoting (copy & paste) of the original postings that we delivered in the original thread (Concerning Daniel 9:24-27).
    Not certain of agreement:
    1. To the five posts each, then maybe five posts more restriction.  Since this discussion-debate is (from my perspective) a form of discussion, some postings may simply present a short question or set of questions for the purpose of clarity.  Placing a numerical restriction would cause a more "debate format" feel to the discussion, and would prevent such a more "discussion" feel for the debate-discussion.  I myself would not prefer this. 
    Added suggestion:
    1. I myself would not be able to commit unto more than one significant posting in the discussion per week.  Certainly, I would be able to present quick "question-postings" at a faster rate; however, I would not be able to present more thorough, thoughtful postings at that faster rate.  In some fashion, I would request that this restriction on my time might be accommodated.
  9. Pastor Scott Markle added a post in a topic: Named Everybody, Somebody, Anybody And Nobody   

    ​Indeed.  Yet I speak not only concerning the lack of workers who have "a mind to work," and the overburdening of those who do work because they are trying to "fill in" for those members of the body who are not fulfilling their God-given responsibility within the body.  I speak also concerning the sinful attitudes that are so commonly stirred up within such cases (even as the parable above mentioned "Somebody's" anger and "Everybody's" blame-shifting).  So very many "are yet carnal" and "walk as men." (1 Corinthians 3:3)
  10. Pastor Scott Markle added a post in a topic: Named Everybody, Somebody, Anybody And Nobody   

    And consider what it might be like to be the pastor for such a group.
  11. Pastor Scott Markle added a post in a topic: Shepherding The Flock - With Respect Of Persons – James 2:1 (Part 2)   

    Weekly Sermon

    This sermon is a companion to a previous sermon:   With Respect of Persons - James 2:1 (Part 1)      

    James 2:1 reads, “ My brethren, have not the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory, with respect of persons .” 

    James 2:1 opens the sixth paragraph of this epistle with a direct and distinct prohibition against showing “ respect of persons .”  As such, this prohibition establishes the contextual setting for the rest of the paragraph.  Grammatically, this verse presents a Biblical imperative for our daily Christian walk.  Furthermore, this Biblical imperative can be divided grammatically into four parts.  First, there is the direct address of loving concern for our daily Christian walk – “ My brethren .”  Second, there is the main clause of spiritual caution for our daily Christian walk – “ Have not the faith .”  Third, there is the prepositional phrase concerning the established center for our daily Christian walk – “ Of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory .”  Finally, there is the prepositional phrase concerning the forbidden characteristic in our daily Christian walk – “ With respect of persons .”  In the part of the message, we considered the first two of these truths.  Now, in this second part of the message, we shall consider the latter two of these truths.

    The Spiritual Caution for Our Daily Christian Walk

    In returning unto James 2:1, the spiritual caution for our daily Christian walk is delivered in the imperative of the main clause, “ Have not the faith .”  This main clause is then modified grammatically by the prepositional phrase, “ With respect of persons .”  Herein the verb “ have ” indicates a matter of daily activity.  Thus we understand that this main clause is referring to our daily Christian walk of faith.  Herein also the preposition “ with ” indicates a joining and unifying of two things.  Thus we are cautioned and commanded never to join the ungodly characteristic of showing respect to persons with our daily Christian walk of faith in our Lord.  As we have already learned, the ungodly practice of showing respect to persons by definition requires that we be focusing our attention upon the external considerations and appearances of this world.  Yet our daily Christian walk is to be a walk “ by faith ,” and “ not by sight .” (2 Corinthians 5:7)  Thus our daily Christian walk of faith by definition requires that we be focusing our attention upon the spiritual considerations and interests of our Lord.  Even so, the ungodly practice of showing respect to persons and the godly walk of faith in our Lord, by definition in each case, are found to be completely in-consistent with one another.  The ungodly characteristic of showing respect to persons is all about “sight;” whereas the godly walk of faith in our Lord is all about “faith.”  Indeed, these two paths of life are so completely contradictory to one another that it is spiritually impossible to join the one with the other.  Whenever the spirit of partiality takes hold of our hearts, the spirit of faith is cast aside.  Yea, whenever we yield ourselves to the ungodly characteristic of showing respect to persons, we must turn aside from the godly walk of faith in and fellowship with our Lord.  These two elements cannot actually reside together in our hearts and lives.  Thus we are spiritually cautioned and commanded against ever at-tempting to join the ungodly practice of showing partiality with our daily Christian walk of faith.

    The Established Center for Our Daily Christian Walk

    Yet as James 2:1 delivers this spiritual caution for our daily Christian walk of faith, it places great emphasis upon the focus of our faith when it modifies the word “faith” with the prepositional phrase, “ Of the Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory .”  Indeed, our Christian walk of faith is a walk that is wholly related to and rooted in our Lord Jesus Christ.  Our Lord Jesus Christ is the established center for our daily Christian walk of faith.  We walk by a faith that is centered in and upon Him.  “ Whom having not seen, ye love; in whom, though now ye see him not, yet believing [that is – believing with faith in and upon Him], ye rejoice with joy unspeakable and full of glory .” (1 Peter 1:8)  Now, recognizing that in the original Greek the phrase, “ with respect of persons ,” is located at the beginning of this statement, we also recognize that the description of our Lord Jesus Christ as “ the Lord of glory ” is located at the end of this statement.  As such, this descriptive of our Lord is also in a place of emphasis, such that this emphasis upon our Lord Jesus Christ as “ the Lord of glory ” is set in direct contrast to the emphasis upon the ungodly characteristic of showing respect to persons.  The spirit of partiality is focused upon the glitter and glamour of this world; whereas the spirit of faith is focused upon the gloriousness and greatness of our Lord.  Even so, when our hearts are gripped with the all-surpassing glory of our majestically glorious Lord, the external, superficial considerations of this world that move us to the practice of respecting persons will have no influence upon our hearts.  On the other hand, when our hearts are being attracted and impressed by the external, superficial considerations of this world that move us to the practice of respecting persons, it reveals that we have developed a disregard and a dishonor for the all-surpassing glory of our Lord.  Oh, how great an offense against our glorious Lord it is when we are more attracted and im-pressed by the glitter and glamour of this world then by His gloriousness and greatness!

    So then, our faith in “ our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory ,” should move us to view other individuals, not from the perspective of their advantages in this world, but from the perspective of their relationship to our Lord.  If an individual is an unbeliever, then we should view that individual as one who is spiritual lost in sin’s darkness, just as we were before our faith in Christ for salvation.  Furthermore, we should view that individual as one who greatly needs to hear the glorious gospel of Jesus Christ.  We should view that individual as one who greatly needs to come unto repentance and the knowledge of the truth.  We should view that individual as one who greatly needs to place his or her trust in the Lord Jesus Christ as personal Savior.  Indeed, we should view that individual and all such individuals as one for whom Christ died, no matter what that individual’s social status, financial wealth, physical appeal, public popularity, or racial distinction might be.

    On the other hand, if an individual is a believer, then we should view that individual as a fellow brother or sister in Christ, as a member in the same spiritual family of God as we are.  We should view that individual as one who possesses the same “ common salvation ” as we do. (Jude 1:3)  We should view that individual as one who possesses the same eternal redemption, the same eternal salvation, the same eternal life, and the same promise eternal inheritance, as we do.  We should view that individual as one who has OB tained “ like precious faith with us through the righteousness of God and our Saviour Jesus Christ .” (2 Peter 1:1)  We should view that individual as one of us who have been “ sanctified in Christ Jesus, called to be saints, with all that in every place call upon the name of Jesus Christ our Lord, both theirs and ours .” (1 Corinthians 1:2)  We should view that individual as one of God’s own dear children just as we are, and who thereby is an heir of God and a joint-heir with Christ just as we are. (Romans 8:16-17)  Indeed, we should view that individual as one in whom Christ lives, no matter what that individual’s social status, financial wealth, physical appeal, public popularity, or racial distinction might be.   
    Posted in Weekly Sermon , James , Sin of Partiality , Walk in Righteousness     
    Please share this post with others:

    View the full article
  12. Pastor Scott Markle added a post in a topic: Shepherding The Flock - Audio Sermon - Looking Unto Jesus   

    Please share this post with others:

    View the full article
  13. Pastor Scott Markle added a post in a topic: Shepherding The Flock - Audio Sermon - Do It For Thy Name's Sake   

    Please share this post with others:

    View the full article
  14. Pastor Scott Markle added a post in a topic: Just How Many?   

    Brother Pittman ("Genevanpreacher"), and to all others who may be concerned,
     
    The fact that Brother Pittman used my site for his negative example has caused no direct offense to me.  My site is in the public venue; therefore, he has the right to handle it as such.  Certainly, I disagree with his dispute, and thus have no intention to change the presentation of the site.  Indeed, I believe that everything which has been presented on the site is Biblically supported, and is thus the Biblical truth for lost sinners.  How God the Holy Spirit chooses to use that presentation in the heart of each lost sinner is certainly under His divine authority, and I shall praise the name of the Lord our Savior for every lost soul whom the Holy Spirit might draw unto Christ thereby.
     
    On the other hand, I do find it interesting how I came to realize that the site of the church that I pastor had become a focal point for a discussion.  It is possible that I would not have known, except that I learned through the record of my "statcounter" that I had a number of hits on the site yesterday.  My "statcounter" also informed me that these various hits found their sending source from this thread.  Actually, one such hit did not move me to curiosity.  However, after a number of such hits, my curiosity moved me to check things out.  I suppose that it might have been nice for someone to inform me that I and our church site had become a focal point for a (negative) discussion.  I also suppose that this might yet have been done if things had continued longer.  Therefore, I am not at all presenting this with a spirit of offense against anyone, but simply as a point for consideration concerning the future.
  15. Pastor Scott Markle added a post in a topic: Shepherding The Flock - I Have Set Thee A Watchman - Ezekiel 33:1-16   

    By the way, this message was preached at Melvin Baptist Church in five parts.  The MP3 for each of these five parts may be found at the following link:
     
    http://www.melvinbaptistchurch.com/sermon-audio.html

Blogs


  1. Devotionals

    • 63
      entries
    • 9
      comments
    • 25263
      views

    Most recent entry

    The Word Listen 聽 In Chinese.
  2. Pastor Scott Markle's Sermons & Devotionals

    • 3
      entries
    • 0
      comments
    • 3348
      views

    Most recent entry

    Wisdom Crieth Without - Proverbs 1:20Ff
    • 0 comments

Status Feed

  1. Pastor Scott Markle

    2015 -- Good Soldier, Not Entangled

  2. Pastor Scott Markle

    2014 - Looking unto Jesus

  3. Pastor Scott Markle

    Directing Our Ways to Keep God's Word

  4. Pastor Scott Markle

    Exalting the Name of Jesus Christ and the Truth of God's Word

    1. Eric Stahl

      Doing this will please God and result in reward.