Jump to content

Photo

Agreement/disagreement With The Pastor


  • Please log in to reply
195 replies to this topic

#21 GraceSaved

GraceSaved

    Daughter of the King of kings

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 540 posts
136
Excellent
  • LocationU.S.A.

Posted 14 August 2014 - 05:36 PM

Dave: I would love for my husband to go and be as involved. He is a wonderful man, provider and father, but unfortunately, he is not spiritually mature and therefore is not fulfilling his spiritual role as he should. I'm sorry to say this is not an option.

#22 DaveW

DaveW

    Resident Aussie and general dumb bloke

  • *Independent Fundamental Baptist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,380 posts
1,917
Excellent
  • LocationI'm a West Aussie

Posted 14 August 2014 - 05:53 PM

That's a shame really, but unfortunately not uncommon.

#23 GraceSaved

GraceSaved

    Daughter of the King of kings

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 540 posts
136
Excellent
  • LocationU.S.A.

Posted 14 August 2014 - 05:58 PM

Well, I took the majority of the advice and decided to make an appt. which is on Tue. at my home with the pastor and his wife. I don't want to make any hasty decisions about possibly having to leave without making clarifications. I'm very nervous. I've never met with a pastor before to go over doctrine. Only for weddings and funerals. :) I'll let you all know the outcome. And thanks again for encouragement and advice.

#24 GraceSaved

GraceSaved

    Daughter of the King of kings

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 540 posts
136
Excellent
  • LocationU.S.A.

Posted 14 August 2014 - 06:02 PM

One more thing. My preparation will consist of all the scripture relating to security and my understanding of those scriptures. I will also list scriptures I am aware of that those who hold to the belief of loss of salvation use so I can be prepared with an answer. If anyone can advise further on how to prepare, I would greatly appreciate it. I know I need to pray, pray, pray. That is no. 1

#25 John81

John81

    Running to Win

  • *Independent Fundamental Baptist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 60,959 posts
5,460
Excellent

Posted 14 August 2014 - 06:11 PM

I'll be in prayer concerning this, you and your pastor. I've added this to my urgent and continual prayer list.



#26 GraceSaved

GraceSaved

    Daughter of the King of kings

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 540 posts
136
Excellent
  • LocationU.S.A.

Posted 14 August 2014 - 06:14 PM

Thank you John.  I highly value the prayers of my brothers and sisters in Christ.  I also have to make prayer lists or I will forget.  :-)



#27 Covenanter

Covenanter

    Super Contributor

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,019 posts
474
Excellent
  • LocationSouthall, West London, England

Posted 15 August 2014 - 08:51 AM

The main Biblical arguments against eternal security are found in Hebrews. A systematic outline study of Hebrews can be found in this link:

http://www.onlinebap...ebrews-2/page-1  It should be helpful as I have tried to put the teaching in its historical context.

 

A dangerous argument for eternal security was put forward by the late Adrian Rogers e.g. in his sermon "Lot - A disgrace to grace" in which he argued that if you have gone through the "salvation prayer" on the lines of: "Lord Jesus, I admit I am a sinner, & I believe you died for my sins, so I can be forgiven" then you are truly saved. You can live a filthy rotten life (like Lot), but you can't lose your salvation.  

 

I reported that sermon to the radio presenters, we looked it up on line so we could be sure we weren't  misrepresenting him, and the presenters agreed that the teaching was false. If we is truly saved, we will live a godly life & bear the fruit of the Spirit. ( Gal. 5:16-25 ) It is NOT denying eternal security to say that a practising sinner is unsaved, even if they have once professed conversion. True salvation continues in faith. We cannot reassure such a person. They MUST repent. Rev. 3:19

 

But, believers are not immediately perfect. We do sin, and grieve because we sin. Our walk in the Spirit is stumbling & erratic, but we dare not turn away from our Saviour God. 

 

Another argument,also using the salvation prayer, &/or the evangelism that calls for decisions for Christ, is that many of those "saved" do fall away. They were accepted as saved, even joining a church & showing a reformed character for a time, before going back into the world. The parable of the sower tells us to expect this, and to look for enduring fruit. (Mat. 13)  

 

So, am I saying we can be saved & lost again? Certainly NOT. We are born again, children of God. Will God disown his so-loved children? Will he abandon his sheep, the sheep he loved & gave his life for, to the wolves? He whose divine power hath given unto us all things that pertain unto life and godliness, will not abandon those he has saved. b



#28 paid4

paid4

    Member

  • *Independent Fundamental Baptist
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 270 posts
178
Excellent
  • LocationJohnston County NC

Posted 15 August 2014 - 09:11 AM

I will share with you what he is going to bring to the table as far as losing your salvation.

 

1. 2 Peter 2:20-21 is used by them. It's taken out of context read the whole chapter, verses 10-19 describes who Peter is talking about.These people changed themselves and were not saved. The key here is a difference of know and believe. James 2:19 shows that knowledge of God doesn't equal salvation. Also the reference to the dog and sow shows that there was no new creation as described in 2 Corinthains 5:17.

 

2. Hebrews 6:4-6 This will probably be what he leads out with. This is their key verse of scripture for explaining this. Again read the whole chapter. Notice in verse 9 the transition wrod BUT. This shows a change from one point or topic to another. After the BUT comes beloved. This shows that the writer was talking about someone else. Now using the same book, lets look at Hebrews 4:1-3. Here the writer describes the people that he is talking about in chapter 6. "but the word preached did not profit them" shows that they were NEVER saved to begin with.

 

3. Revelation 22:19  Here is the final and most misunderstood portion of scripture that will be used. This one will take quite a bit of faith and conviction to explain. They use the key part of this verse "God shall take away his part out of the book of life". The main issue with this is that there are more books than just this one. I don't have time or space to explain it here but the principle of what i believe is a dividing difference between the LAMB's book of life and all other books. It's been explained to me that when you are born your name is written in the book of life and when you're born AGAIN it's written in the LAMB's book of life. See Revelation 3:5, Revelation 13:8, Revelation 17:8, Revelation 20:12-15 are just a few of the verses you can study and make your own judgements on concerning this matter.

 

For sake of time and space here are just a few verses on eternal security to help prove your point.

 

Romans 8:38-39

John 17:9-10

John 10:28-29

John 6:51-58

Hebrews 10:12-14

1 Peter 1:23

1 John 2:17

2 John 1:2

 

Also do a word search of everlasting and eternal.

 

Hope these help.



#29 heartstrings

heartstrings

    He shall feed his flock like a shepherd....

  • *Independent Fundamental Baptist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,349 posts
1,164
Excellent

Posted 15 August 2014 - 10:20 AM

Covenantor, Would you mind posting a link to that "Lot, a disgrace to grace" sermon? All I found was "Don't be a Disgrace to Grace" in which the WHOLE MESSAGE is exhorting born again Christians to live right and separate from the world and worldly lusts. The message also speaks of different Jesus's which the world loves, and the righteous Jesus which the world hates. Adrian Rogers preached the Jesus who loved all mankind, gave himself for everyone. He was a Godly, sound Bible preacher and YOU don't like him because he plowed down the row of the Calvinist/reformed. Truly born again saved persons, indwelled with the Holy Ghost, CAN fall into sin so bad that God will KILL them...he chastens his own. Furthermore, YOU are presently in sin yourself not only because you teach false doctrine, but because you are falsely accusing a man of God.

Please post it, thanks.



#30 paid4

paid4

    Member

  • *Independent Fundamental Baptist
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 270 posts
178
Excellent
  • LocationJohnston County NC

Posted 15 August 2014 - 10:35 AM

One more thing. My preparation will consist of all the scripture relating to security and my understanding of those scriptures. I will also list scriptures I am aware of that those who hold to the belief of loss of salvation use so I can be prepared with an answer. If anyone can advise further on how to prepare, I would greatly appreciate it. I know I need to pray, pray, pray. That is no. 1

I posted Bible references in my previous post but let me say this. God made the hard things simple. We have the Holy Spirit and common sense. Most times you can refute some things by asking the right questions. Jesus did this often and it is the most effective way to change someone's way of thinking.

 

For example in the topic at hand I would ask "When you die, are you still the son/daughter of your parents?"  So then "If you're born again, are you a child of God?"   If that is true,"What can change that fact"?   How about this...."Do adopted children have one set of parents or two"?

 

I hope you can use these to edify other believers.

 

Most of all christians, really sit down and meditate on Gods word and let the Holy Spirit gide you and show you some things that make perfect sense.



#31 GraceSaved

GraceSaved

    Daughter of the King of kings

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 540 posts
136
Excellent
  • LocationU.S.A.

Posted 15 August 2014 - 11:18 AM

Paid4:  Thank you so much for taking the time and giving me scriptures.  Some of them I have and some I did not.  

 

Can I clarify my understanding of Heb 6:4?  I want to know if I am understanding correctly because this is one of the main passages used in their defense.  They interpret this passage to say once a person is saved, if they fall away, they cannot be saved anymore.  That's it. They had their chance, they fell away.  Too bad.  You crucified Christ again.  Shame on you.

 

First, I want to start in Heb 5:12 and going forward.  I'm going to paraphrase so you can understand if my reasoning, interpretation and logic are in tact.  For when the time they ought to be teachers, they were still needing to be taught the "first principles" and still needed milk and not strong meat.  They were still babes and still "believers" but not progressing in their knowledge. 

 

Now going on to Heb 6 (paraphrasing) leave the principles of milk and go on to meat.  v. 4 they were enlightened, tasted the heavenly gift, partakers of the Holy Ghost, tasted the good word of God and powers of the world to come.  What stands out the most to me is they were partakers of the HG.  Only saved people can be partakers, therefore I conclude Paul is addressing believers.

 

v 6 "If they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance"  --- to me this is saying once a person is saved, they don't have to keeping going back to God for salvation if they fall away.  By doing that, it is putting Christ on the cross over and over again putting him to an open shame.  In essence, they are saying Christ's once and for all sacrificial death was not sufficient to cover them anymore because they fell away.  Please save me again.

 

I think Paul is saying look...you are already saved.  Let's move on from those basic principles of salvation (milk) and go on to meat.  Stop trying to get saved again when you already have salvation.

 

v 7 tells us why they need to move on.  Paul uses the analogy of a land that had many showers upon it and good crops come up, and the land experienced God's blessings upon it, but it keeps producing thorns and thistles, the land is of no use.  This not about loss of salvation but of their lack of growth.

 

v 9 But, beloved (still addressing the believer) we want more from you. Things that accompany salvation...not salvation alone.  Then Paul goes on through the chapter and tells them show diligence.  Diligence of what?  The full assurance of hope.

 

So this whole chapter is the assurance of salvation, not the possible loss of it.  If you keep going through the chapter, Paul continues to assure by bringing to their recollection the promise God made to Abraham and that it was an oath, and it is impossible for God to lie.  We have strong consolation, hope and a refuge in that, etc.  You are saved.  Now let's move on.

 

Thank you for letting me test my understanding on you and for being a guinea pig.  :-)       



#32 Jordan Kurecki

Jordan Kurecki

    Independent Baptist Preacher

  • *Independent Fundamental Baptist
  • PipPipPip
  • 197 posts
74
Excellent
  • LocationChicago

Posted 15 August 2014 - 11:28 AM

I don't think I would attend a church that believes you can lose your salvation, I believe this dangerously leads to works salvation.

 

People like this also never tell you how much sin it takes to lose your salvation.

 

There's just so much danger, as if trusting Christ is not enough and that we must add self effort to keep ourselves.

 

What a wicked doctrine from Hell!

 

To me it's clearly no different in principle from what Paul defends from in Galatians, adding the Law to Grace by Faith.

 

If you read Galatians through it clearly demonstrates the principle of Salvation and even Christian living being all by faith and dependence on Christ and not self!


Edited by Jordan Kurecki, 15 August 2014 - 11:29 AM.


#33 ThePilgrim

ThePilgrim

    Super Contributor

  • *Independent Fundamental Baptist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,271 posts
666
Excellent
  • LocationHillsboro, Oregon

Posted 15 August 2014 - 12:34 PM

I think thew biggest danger of the idea that you can lose your salvation is shown in the fact that everyone I have talked to who believes it ( not being God this is just my opinion) commits some sin or other at some time or other after their "conversion".  (Now I am just taking their word that they were "converted".)  Now since they have admittedly sinned since their "conversion" it seems to be by their own words (that if you sin you can lose your salvation), they must have lost their salvation.  But I have never talked to one who believes they have lost their salvation.  (I guess that just means other sinners and not them personally.)

 

Arminians seem to believe the loss of salvations only applies to others and not themselves.  Odd thinking.  Just as strange as an extreme Calvinists who believes only he has been chosen.

 

We all must ask ourselves, "Have I sinned since I claimed Christ as savior?"  

1 John 1:8-10
 
8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.
 
9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
 
10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is not in us.
KJV
 

 

God bless,

Larry



#34 GraceSaved

GraceSaved

    Daughter of the King of kings

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 540 posts
136
Excellent
  • LocationU.S.A.

Posted 15 August 2014 - 12:59 PM

Covenanter:  Are you saying that Lot was not saved?  If so, and I apologize if I misinterpreted your post, but I would have to disagree based on 2 Peter 2.

 

The whole chapter is about false prophets and teachers (having a form of Godliness) living among the truly Godly and their destruction thereof.

 

v 7 And delivered "just" Lot...

 

v 8 "For that "righteous" man (Lot) dwelling among them, in seeing and hearing, vexed (disturbed/troubled) his "righteous" soul from day to day with their (not his) unlawful deeds."

 

v 9 The Lord knoweth how to deliver the godly (Lot) out of temptations...

 

God destroyed the people who vexed him as an example to those false teachers who should come after and live ungodly even though they profess Godliness.



#35 paid4

paid4

    Member

  • *Independent Fundamental Baptist
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 270 posts
178
Excellent
  • LocationJohnston County NC

Posted 15 August 2014 - 02:29 PM

Now going on to Heb 6 (paraphrasing) leave the principles of milk and go on to meat.  v. 4 they were enlightened, tasted the heavenly gift, partakers of the Holy Ghost, tasted the good word of God and powers of the world to come.  What stands out the most to me is they were partakers of the HG.  Only saved people can be partakers, therefore I conclude Paul is addressing believers.

 

 

v 6 "If they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance"  --- to me this is saying once a person is saved, they don't have to keeping going back to God for salvation if they fall away.  

 

 

 

 

 

For them to be enlightened simply means that the gospel has been shared with them. They have tasted and not swallowed or taken in that heavenly gift. Jesus Christ is on their lips but their hearts are far from Him. (Matthey 7:20-23) Being partakers of the Holy Ghost means that they were sharing the work of others (Acts 19:13-15)

 

As far as the renew them again goes, you have to put it into the context of the steps of salvation. Repentance comes to some people but they never accept Jesus. You can hear these people talk about things like; turn the other cheek, new lease on life, turning over a new leaf, starting a new chapter in my life, and things like that. These people may feel different or good for a while but their salvation was hollow and never dependent upon Jesus Christ. Now you can see how that the next time they hear the gospel it's describe as being impossible to get them to repent because to them it didn't work the first time so why try it again. It's all a lack of faith.

 

In all reality we see this a lot in our churches today. People who hear the gospel and have an experience but nothing ever changes because there was no faith or salvation. Sad really.

 

Think on these things and read John 4:10-14 that's the difference between tasting and drinking.



#36 GraceSaved

GraceSaved

    Daughter of the King of kings

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 540 posts
136
Excellent
  • LocationU.S.A.

Posted 15 August 2014 - 04:11 PM

Paid4:  Ok...so the group in v 4 were never truly converted? They were enlightened, tasted, partakers but fell away and rejected Christ, therefore crucifying Him once again through their rejection? So,in a sense, Paul is giving them a warning of possible falling away if we don't go past milk because we wouldn't get the nourishment needed for growth to keep us from falling away and going back to the world or to the law as those in v 4? That's why v 8 says whose end is to be burned?

v 9 is the transition back to the true believer? First a word of warning v 4 and then encouragement? A call from immaturity to maturity?

I'll keep meditating on it.

#37 Salyan

Salyan

    Super Contributor

  • Moderators
  • 3,310 posts
1,066
Excellent
  • LocationSP AB CA

Posted 15 August 2014 - 04:37 PM

Covenantor, Would you mind posting a link to that "Lot, a disgrace to grace" sermon? All I found was "Don't be a Disgrace to Grace" in which the WHOLE MESSAGE is exhorting born again Christians to live right and separate from the world and worldly lusts. The message also speaks of different Jesus's which the world loves, and the righteous Jesus which the world hates. Adrian Rogers preached the Jesus who loved all mankind, gave himself for everyone. He was a Godly, sound Bible preacher and YOU don't like him because he plowed down the row of the Calvinist/reformed. Truly born again saved persons, indwelled with the Holy Ghost, CAN fall into sin so bad that God will KILL them...he chastens his own. Furthermore, YOU are presently in sin yourself not only because you teach false doctrine, but because you are falsely accusing a man of God.

Please post it, thanks.

 

Let's avoid the personal attacks, please and thank you. 



#38 DaveW

DaveW

    Resident Aussie and general dumb bloke

  • *Independent Fundamental Baptist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,380 posts
1,917
Excellent
  • LocationI'm a West Aussie

Posted 15 August 2014 - 05:35 PM

Let's avoid the personal attacks, please and thank you.


He posts trash and someone points that out and THEY get rebuked?

Really???????

#39 John81

John81

    Running to Win

  • *Independent Fundamental Baptist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 60,959 posts
5,460
Excellent

Posted 15 August 2014 - 05:49 PM

I've listened to many sermons from Adrian Rogers and never heard him say anything even remotely like the idea of one being saved and living like the devil. I have heard Charles Stanley say that, but not Adrian Rogers. If he did say that in a sermon I would very much like to hear that sermon for myself.

 

And really, there is no need to bring up Calvinism in every thread or to take shots at one another in every thread.

 

I still love listening to Rogers and have learned much from his sermons over the years but I'm not going to take a jab at someone because they make a claim regarding one of his sermons. I'm content to await a link to the sermon or perhaps a correction if an error has occurred.



#40 prophet1

prophet1

    Senior Member

  • *Independent Fundamental Baptist
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 701 posts
215
Excellent

Posted 15 August 2014 - 07:17 PM

I have been working with a Church of God convert, who is very confused. We struggled and struggled, but he couldn't believe in Eternal Life (OSAS). Come to find out, he was secretly a porn addict. All of his "theology" was because of guilt of unconfessed (and probably unforgiven) sin. This was the second time that I struggled long with an apparent disciple, who turned out to be a pervert. One man, who I challenged on his COGIC illogic, recieved Christ, and has been in the ministry now for years. Difference? He wasn't a pervert hiding his sin, pretending to be fine. I am leary now, of those who slap Christ in the face, and say "your sacrifice was not enough, you need my help in keeping me". I'm afraid I'll find a cross-dresser in the closet, or worse.

Edited by prophet1, 15 August 2014 - 07:17 PM.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

The Fundamental Top 500IFB1000 The Fundamental Top 500